How Te Kaha is changing Christchurch's street scape, from almost every perspective
Monday, 24 February 2025
Christchurch’s new One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha is changing the city’s street scape from almost every angle.
And while it may not be in the same league as the Eiffel Tower or Empire State Building, a landscape architect says in terms of scale it is already a “major presence”.
Landscape architect and environmental planner Di Lucas said the stadium had a big scale compared to Christchurch’s low-level skyline.
“The stadium is definitely a major feature in the grid. The grid that defines our central city is very important and now this interrupts several streets in the grid.”
She said she believed the stadium would provide the city with shelter from the strong easterly winds that blow down the streets that run from east to west.
“I don’t want to compare it to the Eiffel Tower, but it’s definitely a major visual and physical presence and that’s not necessarily a negative,” she said.
She said the stadium’s character was interesting.
“It’s not just a big box. It’s great that it has an interesting form and detail has been applied in consultation with mana whenua,” she said.
It would also work as a prominent landmark to orient people travelling around the city.
“Because so many buildings changed with the earthquakes a lot of people, ones who live out in the suburbs, who don’t live in the central city like I do, say they are disoriented. The stadium gives good orientation, doesn’t it?”
Helen Kerr, urban designer and principal of architecture, landscape and urban design company Isthmus, said Christchurch lost many significant landmarks in the earthquakes, and new ones were needed “for navigation, identity and civic pride”.
“Landmarks say something to visitors about what the city stands for.”
A stadium this close to the centre was “rare” in most cities, she said, noting they were usually found on the edges, such as waterfronts, ports, industrial edges, park lands or transport corridors.
Stadiums could boost inner city businesses, but could deter other “desirable” land uses, such as urban living, because of noise and traffic, she said. At a street level, an “inactive street frontage” discouraged people from walking and cycling between destinations.
“It’s really difficult to integrate the scale of a stadium and its surrounds in a way that is continuously active and vibrant.”
The city should be looking at opportunities to encourage “compatible development” around the stadium, she said.