Ancient swamp kauri given no extra protection in Auckland's High Court
Thursday, 2 March 2017
A High Court justice has ruled against stopping export of New Zealand's ancient swamp kauri, saying any extra restrictions would 'create an oppressive regime'.
The Northland Environmental Protection Society had gone to the High Court at Auckland, seeking to tighten laws about the timber leaving our shores.
The society disputed that swamp kauri table-tops without legs, or logs with 'light surface carving', could lawfully be exported under the Forest Act.
It also accused the Ministry of Primary Industries of letting the wrong type of kauri slip out of the country, and tried to define ancient swamp kauri as a 'protected New Zealand object'.
**READ MORE:
* Swamp kauri carvings a 'crude exercise in deception'
* Swamp kauri hits Auckland High Court
* National treasures protected by arcane law
* Calls to stop swamp kauri trade**
Excavated ancient swamp kauri can be up to 15 metres long and two metres wide.
As trees, the kauri grew for about 2000 years before falling into peat swamps some 50,000 years ago.
These days the preserved wood, dug up in Northland, fetches between $1500 and $6000 per cubic metre on the international market.
Demand for ancient kauri soared after 2010, and has remained steady since 2013.
The product's export is regulated under the Forests Act, which prohibits native timber from leaving the country unless as a 'finished or manufactured' product.
The society claimed that carvings on kauri 'temple poles' exported to China in 2015 were too lightly etched and crude to make a finished product.
A silver fern, tiki and pukeko-like bird along with the words 'New Zealand Kauri' were carved into the logs, which were displayed in a temple 'to promote New Zealand culture to the people of China'.
On Wednesday, High Court Justice Kit Toogood acknowledged that while the appeal of the 'somewhat naive, almost childish embellishments may lie in the eye of the beholder', they were no less authentically finished than cheap souvenirs found in Rotorua or Auckland's Queen St.
The society also argued that swamp kauri tabletops, exported without legs, were arguably unfinished as tables.
Justice Toogood said 'components' of an item were allowed to be exported under the Forest Act and compared the case to a wooden toilet seat being exported with a cistern.
On the subject of whether the Ministry for Primary Industries had been lax in what ancient swamp kauri it let leave the country, Justice Toogood noted that MPI had 'progressively improved its procedures' since late 2011.
He said while there had been 'historical concern' around the types of kauri products exported, he was satisfied with the ministry's current system.
Debate about whether ancient swamp kauri ought to be safeguarded from export under the Protected Objects Act - alongside kauri gum and scrimshaw - ended with Justice Toogood ruling the act was only applicable to particular objects within a species.
He said limiting the export of all ancient swamp kauri would 'create an oppressive regime restricting the removal from New Zealand, by ordinary travellers, of everyday products which have no particular significance'.
Justice Toogood also refuted the society's argument that buried swamp kauri became a fossil - fossils are protected under the act - despite it undergoing some chemical changes underground.
'Undoubtedly, however, it remains wood,' he quoted from McGechan's Ancient Trees.